There are things we can control, things we can influence, and things we can’t control. As we age, our hair is all of these. The importance hair plays in our self-image is reflected in the thousands of hair products currently on the market.

In 1882, Fletcher Sutherland revolutionized the industry with his claim to cure baldness. Reverend Sutherland, a music composer, became known as the father of the “Seven Wonders.” His daughters were considered musical prodigies. Dora, Isabella, Victoria, Naomi, Grace, Sarah and Mary sang at the Atlanta Exposition in Georgia, traveled with the Colossal Shows and joined “Barnum and Bailey’s Greatest Show on Earth” in 1884.

Surprisingly, when the Seven Sutherland Sisters became world famous, it was not for their musical talent, but for their hair. A New York paper reported, “Broadway gaped when the sisters trailed across the gas-lit stage and swung about to shake out their billowing tresses to a concerted gasp.” Blessed with crowning glories, these sisters had a collective hair length of 37 feet.

When Fletcher Sutherland realized his daughters’ long hair was a greater attraction than their musical ability, he created the Seven Sutherland Sisters’ Hair Grower.  He reasoned if grain and grasses grew strong with fertilizers, why not hair? With his guarantee that the solution could cure baldness and produce thick, luxurious hair, it became one of the most successful snake oil tonics of all time.

A chemical analysis revealed the tonic contained 56 percent water of witch hazel, 44 percent bay rum, salt and hydrochloric acid, hardly capable of creating new hair growth. However, the sisters netted $90,000 the first year, selling the tonic for a dollar a bottle. Over a 38-year period, the Sutherland family brought in more than $2.75 million selling hair products.

The Sutherland sisters lived an elegant lifestyle in a mansion they built in New York, with personal maids to care for their hair. Their lives were entwined with their hair, weaving tales of success, heartbreak and poverty.

Sarah, the oldest sister, born in 1846, was considered the most sensible of the girls, and took over the business after her father’s death in 1888. She was often photographed seated so her three-foot long hair would appear longer. Although she was one of the wealthiest women at the time, she died of poor health and poverty at the age of 73.

The second sister, Victoria, had seven-foot long hair, the color of a “raven’s wing.” She was once offered $2,500 to cut her hair but refused. She later sold one strand to a jeweler who suspended it in his shop window with a seven carat diamond at the end. Considered to be the most beautiful of the sisters, Victoria horrified her family when at the age of 50; she married a 19-year-old man. She only lived another three years.

Isabella’s hair was six-feet long. It was rumored her mother was actually her father’s sister-in-law, as she was listed as “adopted” in the Census. At the age of 46, she married Frederick, a 27-year old man reportedly in love with her sister Dora. Known as a famous pistol shooter, he often sat on the veranda playing with his gun. One day as he was shooting out the spokes of a farmer’s buggy parked nearby, he turned the gun on himself and died instantly. It was reported that Isabella kept his body in the home for 10 days until she was forced to release it.

Naomi began singing with her sisters at the age of 12 and was sent to Europe to develop her marvelous bass voice. She met and married Henry Bailey while traveling with Barnum and Bailey’s Circus. They had four children before she died of an illness at 35.

Grace’s auburn hair was five-feet long. Although she never married, she raised Naomi’s children after her sister died. In 1924, Grace, Mary and Dora moved to California, where Dora was hit and killed by a car while crossing the street. Grace and Mary returned penniless to the Sutherland Mansion in 1930. Grace lived to be 92.

In their lifetime, people believed long, heavy hair robbed the brain of nourishment and led to insanity. Mary, the youngest of the sisters, was considered mentally ill. It was reported that her family locked her in the bedroom when she suffered “spells.” Mary lived in the Sutherland Mansion for most of her life but eventually was committed to the State Institution for the Insane, where she died at 93.

Fletcher Sutherland died in 1888, and two of his daughters, Naomi and Victoria, were deceased by 1912. That, however, did not stop the sales of the Seven Sutherland Sisters Hair Grower. The remaining five daughters and Henry Bailey recruited two “sisters” and continued traveling and selling their products. The tonic was still being advertised in 1930, although the business was declining.

Reverend Sutherland would be amazed at the volume of hair products on the market today. One hundred and thirty-three years have passed since Fletcher claimed to have solved all hair problems; however, hair loss continues to be a major concern. Men spend more than $800 million a year for hair transplants. And medical therapies (including Rogaine, Propecia and other brands) add up to $225 million annually.

The Sutherland Sisters might be pleased to know the sale of hair products in the United States rose to $11.6 billion in 2014, and the average woman spends up to $44,300 for hair products in her lifetime. Advertisers continue to seduce and sell the dream of thick, luxurious hair while consumers still seek products to control and influence their hair.

 

Jan Rich is a freelance writer from Lakewood. She has written previously for Senior Scene.

The Sutherland sisters, known in the 1880s as the "Seven Wonders" for their musical talents, ultimately became world-famous for their combined 37 feet of hair and the family's baldness "cure" that did nearly $3 million in sales.
The Sutherland sisters, known in the 1880s as the “Seven Wonders” for their musical talents, ultimately became world-famous for their combined 37 feet of hair and the family’s baldness “cure” that did nearly $3 million in sales.

The effective treatment of rheumatoid arthritis includes medications that slow the progression of joint damage and deformity. These drugs are called disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and they are a vital part of an overall treatment plan.

Doctors prescribe DMARDs for people with inflammatory arthritis who are at risk of permanent joint damage. Each DMARD works in different ways to slow or stop the inflammatory process that can damage the joints and internal organs.

DMARDs can improve quality of life for most people. Some even achieve a remission while taking them. Most of the time, the disease activity continues, but at a slower pace. While taking one or more DMARDs, there may be longer symptom-free periods, or less painful flare-ups. Taking a DMARD regularly makes it less likely to have long-term damage to joints, too.

There can be side-effects. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved all DMARDs, and many people take them without ever having problems. But because they work throughout the body to fight rheumatoid arthritis, their powerful action typically does cause some side effects, such as:

  • Stomach upset. Other medicines can help treat these symptoms, or they can improve as your body adjusts to the drug. If the symptoms are too uncomfortable, your rheumatologist will try a different medication.
  • Liver problems. Less common than stomach upset, you may need blood tests on a regular basis to make sure your liver is not being harmed.
  • Blood issues. DMARDs can affect the immune system and raise the risk of infection. Infection-fighting white blood cells may also be decreased. Low red blood cells (anemia) can make you tired more easily. An occasional blood test will make sure your blood counts are high enough.

Though DMARDs can have side-effects, there is a good reason to take them: They usually work. Even if you are in a remission, many rheumatologists believe you should continue taking a DMARD, just to keep your rheumatoid arthritis at bay.

DMARDs are often prescribed together or with a biologic. This is called combination therapy. Biologic drugs are the newest type of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, but it’s important to understand the differences between treating rheumatoid arthritis with these newer medications compared to traditional DMARDs:

  • Drug target. DMARDs target the entire immune system, while biologics work by targeting specific steps in the inflammatory process.
  • Response time. It can take months before you’ll know whether a DMARD is working for you. With biologics, you’re likely to experience results within four to six weeks, after just a few treatments. In the meantime, your doctor may also prescribe a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or a steroid medication to help relieve pain and swelling.
  •  Risks. Both DMARDs and biologics can increase your risk for infections, so tell your doctor if you experience a fever, chills, or cold symptoms. Serious infections, such as pneumonia, are the biggest risk of taking a biologic.
  • Cost. Biologics are much more expensive than traditional DMARDs. If you need help paying for your rheumatoid arthritis treatment, you may be able to apply for assistance through your specific medication’s manufacturing company.

Both traditional DMARDs and newer biologics are changing the way doctors treat rheumatoid arthritis. Today, there are actually better treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis, and earlier treatment is best. That’s because once joint damage has occurred, it can’t be undone.

 

Source: Comfort Keepers, whose services include assisting seniors living independently at home. Comfort Keepers has a location in Federal Way.

Have you heard that some of Social Security’s rules about claiming benefits are changing? Well, it’s true. The Bipartisan Budget Act that passed last November closed two complex loopholes that were used primarily by married couples. We want you to know why this happened, how it might affect you, and what you should do next.

But first, don’t forget that one of the best ways to increase your Social Security retirement benefit is to delay claiming it between ages 62 and 70. Each month you delay results in a higher monthly benefit for the rest of your life. The new law doesn’t change this.

The new law closes loopholes that allowed some married couples to receive higher benefits than intended. Only a small fraction of retirees used these loopholes. Closing them helps restore fairness and strengthens Social Security’s long-term financing.

So what’s changing with the new rules?

  • First, if you are eligible for benefits both as a retiree and as a spouse (or divorced spouse), you must start both benefits at the same time. This “deemed filing” used to apply only before the full retirement age, which is currently 66. Now it applies at any age up to 70, if you turned 62 after January 1, 2016.
  • Second, if you take your retirement benefit and then ask (on or after April 30, 2016) to suspend it to earn delayed retirement credits, your spouse or dependents generally won’t be able to receive benefits on your Social Security record during the suspension. You also won’t be able to receive spouse benefits on anyone else’s record during that time.

For more information about these changes in the law, please visit Recent Social Security Claiming Changeshttps://www.ssa.gov/planners/retire/claiming.html.

Deciding when to start your Social Security benefits is a complex and personal decision. You may contact Social Security at 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778), or visit your local field office, to speak with a representative about your retirement options. In particular, if you are or will be full retirement age (66) or older before April 30, and you think you want to suspend your benefits, contact us as soon as possible before April 30. But remember, if you want to let your retirement benefit grow, you can simply delay taking it, up to age 70.

 

Virginia Reno, who wrote this article, is a Social Security Administration deputy commissioner.

For many, the Golden Years are anything but from a financial standpoint. Increasing debt among seniors, disappearing pension plans and the uncertainty of Social Security are causing tension and stress.

According to the Institute on Assets and Social Policy, one third of senior households have no money left over or are in debt after paying their basic expenses each month. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board reported that in 2013, 61.3 percent of households headed by an adult 60+ carried debt; of those households, debt averaged $40,900. Seniors are even grappling with student debt.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office says that 706,000 senior households held a record $18.2 billion in student loans in 2013.

“Living on a fixed income while paying off debt can be a real hardship for older adults,” said Mike Sullivan, a financial expert with Take Charge America, a national non-profit credit counseling and debt management agency. “Even so, there are smart ways they can tackle their debt before and even during retirement to restore their financial wellbeing and peace of mind.”

Sullivan offers seniors five tips for paying off debt:

  • Start with bad debt. People nearing retirement should first focus on bad debt such as car loans and credit cards, paying down high-interest loans while making minimum payments on other debts. Once one debt is paid, they can move onto the next until all balances are cleared.
  • Rising home prices have resulted in longer-term mortgages, which means many people are still paying off home loans when they reach retirement. Though it’s an emotional topic for many, downsizing to a less expensive home is worth considering – especially for seniors with sizable mortgages or other debt.
  • Pay off mortgage loans. Whether or not they choose to downsize, seniors who pay off their mortgages will have a large increase in disposable dollars – money that can pay off other debts or fund retirement savings. This option is best for seniors with cash reserves, and only after other high-interest debt has been paid. It may also make sense for seniors to refinance their mortgage loan to secure a lower interest rate and take advantage of federal programs for homeowners.
  • Consider a reverse mortgage. Reverse mortgages aren’t right for everyone, as they come with high fees, high interest rates, and must be repaid when the owner dies or moves away. However, retirees with equity in their homes who are struggling to make ends meet may benefit, as it frees up cash that can be directed at other debts. People considering a reverse mortgage should consult a HUD-approved counselor for help.
  • Delay retirement. Many people of retirement age are in excellent health and capable of working longer, allowing them to bring in income, pay off debts and delay tapping their Social Security benefits or other sources of retirement income. Seniors who carry deep debt may want to postpone retirement for a few years.