In early 2020, Congress and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added temporary telehealth flexibilities to Medicare to help beneficiaries safely obtain needed services during the pandemic. The legislative and administrative updates broadened Medicare telehealth coverage in a number of ways. From expanding the list of allowable services and methods of communication to waiving restrictions on where patients and providers are located, the public health emergency changes have allowed more beneficiaries to receive more services via telehealth, using more types of technology and from more locations, including their own home.
The uptake was swift. Telemedicine use, particularly in original Medicare, grew dramatically within a matter of weeks. Before the pandemic, approximately 13,000 beneficiaries received telemedicine in any given week. By the end of April 2020, that number had skyrocketed to 1.7 million.
Many of these telehealth policies are time-limited and will expire when the public health emergency period does, unless policymakers step in and extend them. With such decisions looming, a new brief from the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) discusses the current Medicare telehealth coverage landscape and potential next steps.
The brief confirms the rapid and widespread nature of the coverage expansions. According to KFF, one in four Medicare beneficiaries had a telehealth visit during the COVID-19 public health emergency, and most of those visits (56 percent) were done by phone. Telehealth use was higher among Medicare beneficiaries under the age of 65, beneficiaries enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid, Black and Hispanic beneficiaries, and those with six or more chronic conditions.
While Medicare Rights applauds the successes of the pandemic-specific telehealth changes, KFF’s findings underscore how much is still unknown about the impact of these sudden shifts on beneficiaries and the program.
Critically, the developments during the public health emergency represent the biggest shift in Medicare telehealth policy and utilization since the services were created nearly 25 years ago. Although these flexibilities have addressed some systemic barriers, the beneficiary experience has been mixed. Some callers to the Medicare Rights Center’s national helpline have reported greater access to care, while others are being left behind.
We continue to urge policymakers to move forward deliberately and collaboratively, collecting and following the data, and prioritizing health equity, as well as beneficiary needs and preferences. Doing so will best ensure a system that works for all people with Medicare.